!!> PDF ⚣ The Houses of History: A Criticial Reader in Twentieth-Century History and Theory ✈ Author Anna Green – Higo2cam.info

The Houses of History: A Criticial Reader in Twentieth-Century History and Theory I read enough of this book to say I ve read it I may have skim read a few chapters But this was my textbook for my history theory class this past semester It was not as horrible as I imagined it would be, in fact it gave me a good insight into the different theories, methods and especially ideologies with which historians approach the past I just found it a bit dull to be honest. Possibly the best comprehensive textbook I ve ever used Nuanced, in depth, well structured, and interesting I found it useful and fascinating. A great overview of the different types of theory used in historical research If you need a basic understanding of each group to help ground thedifficult philosophical text that you are studying, this book gives great insight. Some chapters were better than others. This was pretty good I had to read it for a graduate independent seminar in graduate historiography Each of the houses are different approaches historians take to research and write about history Frankly, I think we need to use all of them because just focusing on history through one method causes a lot of history to be ignored and left out For example, the house of diplomatic history focuses on official documents, treaties, and diplomatic affairs between two countries which only covers This was pretty good I had to read it for a graduate independent seminar in graduate historiography Each of the houses are different approaches historians take to research and write about history Frankly, I think we need to use all of them because just focusing on history through one method causes a lot of history to be ignored and left out For example, the house of diplomatic history focuses on official documents, treaties, and diplomatic affairs between two countries which only covers official documents and this is too limiting as it leaves out everything else Whatever happens within a country that doesn t involve diplomacy between that country and another country is just not bothered with Not quite as clear and jargon free as advertized but just may be because the authors are from New Zealand and copy the British model for writing about history and such, whereas I, an American, am used to a different format I found the examples located in the second half of each chapterinteresting except for like two of them then the first halves that deal with the history and pros cons and such of each different method or theory in the world of historical research Although I am a his Not quite as clear and jargon free as advertized but just may be because the authors are from New Zealand and copy the British model for writing about history and such, whereas I, an American, am used to a different format I found the examples located in the second half of each chapterinteresting except for like two of them then the first halves that deal with the history and pros cons and such of each different method or theory in the world of historical research Although I am a historian and graduate student, I really just don t care about Methodology oh no, how dare I and blah blah blah or all the theories, especially the Marxist and postmodern poststructural ones or the like I really just do not care, yet I HAVE to study it and read about it as part of the history program If you are into this sort of thing, this book is for you The way history is primarily taught at the undergraduate level leaves out discussion of different historiographical schools Students learn facts, read textbooks, inadvanced courses they deal with different scholarship, but rarely discuss what type of history the author proscribes to, unless he or she is a Marxist historian For some reason that is mentionedoften than others But the field of history is vast and its practitioners varied This book serves as a useful introduction to r The way history is primarily taught at the undergraduate level leaves out discussion of different historiographical schools Students learn facts, read textbooks, inadvanced courses they deal with different scholarship, but rarely discuss what type of history the author proscribes to, unless he or she is a Marxist historian For some reason that is mentionedoften than others But the field of history is vast and its practitioners varied This book serves as a useful introduction to readers looking for aadvanced understanding of history as a discipline On occasion the introductions would leave me confused towards the meanings and methodology of each school of history, and this would be remedied within reading a single page of the corresponding sample chapter This is not good for a book which claims to be clear and jargon free However the sample chapters were chosen well and of the introductions which were clear, they explained the school of history adequately The annales school section was a personal highlight. Having a work like this is immensely helpful as a backbone for a historiography class However, I do not think this book accomplishes its task as well as it could Green and Troup author each chapter covering a different historiographical field or question themselves, and follow each chapter with an article corresponding to said chapter s subject It would have been better had this been acomplete anthology, with various experts in appropriate subjects authoring the chapters appropriate to Having a work like this is immensely helpful as a backbone for a historiography class However, I do not think this book accomplishes its task as well as it could Green and Troup author each chapter covering a different historiographical field or question themselves, and follow each chapter with an article corresponding to said chapter s subject It would have been better had this been acomplete anthology, with various experts in appropriate subjects authoring the chapters appropriate to their academic specialties This would have prevented the inevitable problem of Green and Troup writing a chapter on a field or subject that they are not themselves intimately familiar with this is particularly clear in the chapters on Marx and post structuralism.That said, for what it is, it gets the job done Every Piece Of Historical Writing Has A Theoretical Basis On Which Evidence Is Selected, Filtered, And Understood This Is As True Of Scientific Empiricism As It Is Of PoststructualismThe Houses Of History Provides A Comprehensive Introduction To The Twelve Schools Of Thought Which Have Had The Greatest Influence On The Study Of History In The Twentieth Century Ranging From Empiricism To Postcolonialism, Marxism To The Ethnohistorians, Each Chapter Begins With An Introduction To The Particular School, The Main Protagonists, The Critics, And Is Followed By A Useful Section Of Further Readings From The Classic, Such As G R Elton S England Under The Tudors And E P Thompson S The Making Of The English Working Class, To The Recent, Such As Henrietta Whiteman S White Buffalo Woman And Judith Walkowitz S City Of Dreadful Delight, The Diverse Selections Collected Here Bring Together The Leading Historians And Theorists Of The CenturyComprehensive And Accessible To Undergraduates, The Houses Of History Is Ideally Suited To Classroom Use


About the Author: Anna Green

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the The Houses of History: A Criticial Reader in Twentieth-Century History and Theory book, this is one of the most wanted Anna Green author readers around the world.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *